Comments on: Iran: Clinton's threat and a controversial photo http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/ Americans vote. The world speaks. Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:24:42 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Bea http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-158 Bea Sat, 10 May 2008 19:55:02 +0000 http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/#comment-158 As a society we must learn to speak out against such disgusting verbiage. I wonder how anyone, let alone someone running for office, could make such an offensive and idiotic statement. What's more, how could anyone think that she should represent America. I'm sure the Iranian-Americans felt violated and exposed to yet one more Iran-bashing. She doesn't represent me and just recently I bashed a representative from Iowa about making the same kind of insensitive and uncalled for remarks. Do we allow it? No. Responsibility comes with our citizenship and we can speak out about what we know is not right. Make no mistake, some of what comes out of the Iranian President's mouth is far worse, but coming out of an American senator's is, somehow, worse. Check out what I had to say about another silly incident from a politician. <a>Click here</a> As a society we must learn to speak out against such disgusting verbiage. I wonder how anyone, let alone someone running for office, could make such an offensive and idiotic statement. What’s more, how could anyone think that she should represent America. I’m sure the Iranian-Americans felt violated and exposed to yet one more Iran-bashing.

She doesn’t represent me and just recently I bashed a representative from Iowa about making the same kind of insensitive and uncalled for remarks. Do we allow it? No. Responsibility comes with our citizenship and we can speak out about what we know is not right.

Make no mistake, some of what comes out of the Iranian President’s mouth is far worse, but coming out of an American senator’s is, somehow, worse.

Check out what I had to say about another silly incident from a politician. Click here

]]> By: lee lehman http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-102 lee lehman Sat, 03 May 2008 02:41:08 +0000 http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/#comment-102 Thank you for bringing attention about the FRAUD incident in CA. How nice that they will defer it until after the election. Surely the Democratic party can not afford to put HRC in the nomintional position. By the time November gets here you know that JMc will get more use out of this than anything he could find on Senator Obama. It is time for the Clinton's to walk away with their tails between their legs. They are 2 of the nastiest people I've ever seen in my life; and it seems as though Chelsea has inherited their ignorance. Remember, as a citizen of the USA, you do not owe her anything. Just remember all the lies in her campaign, the number of times her campaign has been turned upside down, the lies, the lies and the even more lies. I dont' know how (she) they look in a mirror. Thank you for bringing attention about the FRAUD incident in CA. How nice that they will defer it until after the election. Surely the Democratic party can not afford to put HRC in the nomintional position. By the time November gets here you know that JMc will get more use out of this than anything he could find on Senator Obama. It is time for the Clinton’s to walk away with their tails between their legs. They are 2 of the nastiest people I’ve ever seen in my life; and it seems as though Chelsea has inherited their ignorance. Remember, as a citizen of the USA, you do not owe her anything. Just remember all the lies in her campaign, the number of times her campaign has been turned upside down, the lies, the lies and the even more lies. I dont’ know how (she) they look in a mirror.

]]> By: jcrow http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-94 jcrow Thu, 01 May 2008 21:09:37 +0000 http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/#comment-94 Core Democrat, Obama said that "must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan" - http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0132206420070801 No mention of nukes. And he was talking about specific Al Qaeda forces - ""If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will" So comparing the two isn't really apples to apples. Core Democrat,

Obama said that “must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan” – http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0132206420070801

No mention of nukes. And he was talking about specific Al Qaeda forces – “”If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will”

So comparing the two isn’t really apples to apples.

]]> By: Core Democrat http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-93 Core Democrat Thu, 01 May 2008 15:45:29 +0000 http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/#comment-93 WHERE IS THE QUOTE MADE BY OBAMA THAT HE WAS GOING TO NUKE PAKISTAN? WHERE IS THE QUOTE MADE BY OBAMA THAT HE WAS GOING TO NUKE PAKISTAN?

]]> By: RNash http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-92 RNash Thu, 01 May 2008 12:54:45 +0000 http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/04/30/iran-clintons-threat-and-a-controversial-photo/#comment-92 In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election! Why hasn't This recieved any coverage by the News Media? (Peater F Paul vs Clintons ) Has she really been fully veted? In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!
Why hasn’t This recieved any coverage by the News Media? (Peater F Paul vs Clintons ) Has she really been fully veted?

]]>